Legal Opinion

Polster v. Sacramento County Office of Education

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 2009No. C059733PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUTZ, J.

This case arises out of a turf battle between the Sacramento County Superintendent of Schools and the governing board of a “lame duck” school district, which was on the verge of absorption into a new, larger district.

Defendants and appellants Sacramento County Office of Education (SCOE) and Sacramento County Superintendent of Schools David W. Gordon (Gordon; collectively, SCOE) appeal from a judgment granting a writ of mandate commanding Gordon to process payroll requests pursuant to a transition plan adopted by the outgoing board of the Grant Joint Union High School District…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Worldmark, the Club v. Wyndham Resort Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Grant Park Neighborhood Assn. Advocates v. Dept. of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  3. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2018
  4. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2018
  5. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API