Polster v. Sacramento County Office of Education
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
This case arises out of a turf battle between the Sacramento County Superintendent of Schools and the governing board of a “lame duck” school district, which was on the verge of absorption into a new, larger district.
Defendants and appellants Sacramento County Office of Education (SCOE) and Sacramento County Superintendent of Schools David W. Gordon (Gordon; collectively, SCOE) appeal from a judgment granting a writ of mandate commanding Gordon to process payroll requests pursuant to a transition plan adopted by the outgoing board of the Grant Joint Union High School District…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Marriage of BondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Worldmark, the Club v. Wyndham Resort Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Grant Park Neighborhood Assn. Advocates v. Dept. of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2018
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2018
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2022