Legal Opinion

Clinton v. Yates

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1928No. Docket No. 5913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

This action is based upon a promissory note.

Appellants admit the due execution and delivery of said note, but claim it was given without consideration. The evidence shows that in April, 1925, the respondent leased to the appellants for a term of two years a house; that in the house were certain household goods such as carpets, draperies, chairs, tables, etc.; that the respondent and appellants inventoried said goods and placed a separate value on each article, the total value being $642; that the appellants purchased said personal property, giving therefor the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moss v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. In Re Estate JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Neal v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API