Clinton v. Yates
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
This action is based upon a promissory note.
Appellants admit the due execution and delivery of said note, but claim it was given without consideration. The evidence shows that in April, 1925, the respondent leased to the appellants for a term of two years a house; that in the house were certain household goods such as carpets, draperies, chairs, tables, etc.; that the respondent and appellants inventoried said goods and placed a separate value on each article, the total value being $642; that the appellants purchased said personal property, giving therefor the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moss v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- In Re Estate JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by1 opinion
- Neal v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019