Legal Opinion

In Re Christopher T.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 2, 1999No. 06733, Sept. Term. 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLANDER, Judge.

In this case, we must determine whether the juvenile court erred by requiring Christopher T., appellant, to proceed to trial without an attorney. Nine-year old Christopher was charged in a delinquency petition with burglary and related offenses. Following an adjudicatory hearing, the Circuit Court for Charles County, sitting as a juvenile court, found Christopher “involved” in conduct equivalent to first and fourth degree burglary, theft of property valued at more than $300.00, and willful and malicious destruction of property valued at less than $300.00. The court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Shawn P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. In Re Blessen H.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API