Legal Opinion

County of Bucks v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

The County of Bucks (County) petitions for review of the decision of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) directing it to bear 75 percent of the costs of closing a pedestrian bridge, periodically inspecting it, and maintaining it. The remaining 25 percent of these costs were allocated to the Township of Bristol (Township).

*680In July of 1985, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) filed a petition with the PUC requesting the abolition of the crossing where the Central Avenue pedestrian bridge crosses over Amtrak’s tracks within the Township and County.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Allegheny County Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Greene Township Board of Supervisors v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API