Legal Opinion
City of Seattle v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 19, 1970No. 337-1, 338-1PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames, C. J.
In two King County causes, Johnaphra Jones was found guilty of conduct proscribed by a section of an ordinance of the City of Seattle which defines and makes unlawful the practice of prostitution. Her appeals have been consolidated for review. The ordinance in its entirety is as follows:
It is unlawful for anyone:(a) To commit or offer or agree to commit an act of prostitution; or(b) To secure or offer to secure another for the purpose of committing an act of prostitution; or(c) To knowingly transport a person into or within the city with purpose to promote that person’s engaging in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Silvar v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Seattle v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Seattle v. SlackWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. HenningsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.