Legal Opinion
United States Steel Corp. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 1, 1969No. 65 Civ. 3043PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTION NO. 3.
LEVET, District Judge.
The United States of America, the above-entitled defendant, has moved under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment with respect to the claim of the plaintiff for refund of 1950 excess profits tax payments set forth in paragraphs 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the complaint, dealing with cost-price relationships.
The relevant claims alleged in the complaint are as follows:
“Denial of Application of § 442
“9. Plaintiff duly filed with its consolidated Federal income and excess profits tax return for 1950 a claim that, in determining its…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Albert Scolnick and Celia Scolnick v. Louis J. Lefkowitz and Isidore SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Prior v. RathjenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Gulf Underwriters Insurance v. City of Council BluffsDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2010
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Prior v. RathjenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972