Van Roo v. Van Roo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.
By suit in equity, the plaintiff-appellant prayed that the defendant-respondent lie enjoined from using a portion of the plaintiff-appellant’s property as a roadway and for damage for use.
From here on reference is made to the parties as appellant and respondent.
The respondent by her answer admitted the use of such premises as a driveway but claimed that she did so by an adverse user which had ripened into a prescriptive right. The appellant and the respondent own adjoining premises and the portion of the driveway in suit was used by the respondent as a means of entry to her premises. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Belotti v. . BickhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Burr v. MillsNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Bushey v. SantiffNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Root v. ConklingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Rogoff v. Neal Vanderbilt Sons Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Di Leo v. Pecksto Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Tomaino v. TomainoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Saff v. SaffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Mastin v. Village of LimaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Brant Lake Shores, Inc. v. BartonNew York Supreme Court · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.