Shaw v. Stein
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
Plaintiff brought suit upon a negotiable promissory note for $500, payable to the order of William West. Upon this note appeared the name of Charles Hack, as maker, and William West, William C. West, and Peter Stein, in the order named, as indorsers. It was admitted that William C. West and William West were one and the same person. No service was obtained upon Charles Hack, as he had removed from the State. West and Stein pleaded separately, and the latter only made any defense in the court below. In a notice under the general issue, Stein was permitted so introduce testimony tending to show…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Manistee National Bank v. SeymourMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Farwell v. EnsignMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. SmedleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Auto Purchase Corp. v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949