Legal Opinion

Kronstain v. Miller

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 2011No. 255 EDA 2010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUNDY, J.:

Appellant, Hatboro Medical Associates (hereinafter Hatboro), appeals from the order entered on December 16, 2009, ordering a new trial as to causation only. 1 The order granted in part the motion for post-trial relief filed by Appellees, Susan Kronstain, the executrix of the estate of Bert Dares, and Florence Dares, the decedent’s widow. 2 For reasons set forth herein, we quash this appeal.

Bert Dares, the decedent, suffered a massive stroke on December 31, 2003. N.T., 7/28/09, at 85. The underlying case arises from the action filed by Appellees, alleging that Dare’s stroke…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fritz v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Vogelsberger v. Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Johnson v. FrazierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Yon v. YarusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Com. v. Held, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Com. v. Wardlaw, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Commonwealth v. Wardlaw, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Jaroszewicz, J. v. OZ Properties, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Shahid, A. v. McMonagle, Perri, McHughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API