Kronstain v. Miller
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MUNDY, J.:
Appellant, Hatboro Medical Associates (hereinafter Hatboro), appeals from the order entered on December 16, 2009, ordering a new trial as to causation only. 1 The order granted in part the motion for post-trial relief filed by Appellees, Susan Kronstain, the executrix of the estate of Bert Dares, and Florence Dares, the decedent’s widow. 2 For reasons set forth herein, we quash this appeal.
Bert Dares, the decedent, suffered a massive stroke on December 31, 2003. N.T., 7/28/09, at 85. The underlying case arises from the action filed by Appellees, alleging that Dare’s stroke…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fritz v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Vogelsberger v. Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Johnson v. FrazierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Yon v. YarusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
3Cited by5 opinions
- Com. v. Held, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Wardlaw, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. Wardlaw, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Jaroszewicz, J. v. OZ Properties, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Shahid, A. v. McMonagle, Perri, McHughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024