Legal Opinion

Krauss v. Claar

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 8, 2005PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUSMANNO, J.:

¶ 1 Jack Krauss and Cindy Brillman (“Plaintiffs”) appeal from the Order denying their Motion to strike the judgment of non “pros entered for failure to file a certificate of merit under the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure governing professional liability actions. 1 We reverse.

¶ 2 This action commenced in December 2001 by the filing of a Writ of Summons, in which Plaintiffs sought ejectment of D. Elmeda Claar (“Claar”) and Hollidaysburg Trust Company (“Hollidaysburg Trust”) 2 from certain property located in Blair and Bedford Counties. Subsequently, in September…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Fiorentino v. RapoportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Cost v. CostSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Merlini Ex Rel. Merlini v. Gallitzin Water AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. French v. Commonwealth Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Smith v. Friends HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Ferencz v. MedlockDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Merlini Ex Rel. Merlini v. Gallitzin Water AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API