Legal Opinion

People v. Delgado

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 2012No. F063396PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DETJEN, J.

In the published portion of this opinion, we hold Penal Code section 1237.1 does not preclude a defendant from raising, as the sole issue on an appeal, a claim his or her presentence custody credits were calculated pursuant to the wrong version of the applicable statute.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On July 8, 2010, an information was filed in Kern County Superior Court, charging defendant Fernando Delgado with various offenses arising out of a domestic violence incident that occurred between February 28 and March 1, 2010.1 On November 4, 2010, defendant entered into a plea agreement…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. FloresCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. SinohuiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Uriel Gonzalez v. Stuart ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. People v. Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. In re Jason V.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. In re Jason V.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API