Schmidt v. Blankschien
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFaiRchild, J.
Considerable confusion seems to have attended the various steps taken by the plaintiff in the garnishee action. The trial court with some degree of justification complains of the confusion. No matter who is to blame, the result has been that the real question in issue has not been tried. In its findings of fact the trial court found the Sunshine Dairy Company indebted to the Seneca Cheese Factory, a de facto corporation, and in the memorandum opinion it is stated “In the absence of a right on the part of Bernstein to make collection of the amount due to Seneca Cheese Factory on the grounds of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Francis H. Leggett & Co. v. West Salem Canning Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Depot Realty Syndicate v. Enterprise Brewing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Walter v. Four Wheel Drive Auto Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Senger v. MalloyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. LedesmaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954