Legal Opinion

Walter v. Four Wheel Drive Auto Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

As a matter of brevity, the defendant corporation Four Wheel Drive Auto Company will hereinafter be referred to as the “Auto Company;” and an allied corporation named the Four Wheel Drive Sales Company will be referred to as the “Sales Company.” The Sales Company was a separate corporation incorporated in 1929 to sell the entire output manufactured by the Auto Company. They had offices in the same building at Clintonville, Wisconsin, and Walter Olen was the president of both corporations.

The issues of fact raised by the pleadings, as indicated in the foregoing statement, were, excepting as to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. McDermott v. JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Voell v. KleinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Francis H. Leggett & Co. v. West Salem Canning Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Stevens v. Montfort State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vollmer v. LuetyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Zweck v. D P Way Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Gust v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. BannisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. HarpCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API