Legal Opinion
Robine v. Apco, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 13, 1967No. 53, Docket 29321PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Chief Judge:
This appeal by Paul Robine and Walter C. Lambert from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, entered on March 5, 1964, dismissing their complaint in this patent infringement action, depends on whether the evidence presented any question of fact with regard to the validity of their patent. As we hold that no question of fact was presented and that the court’s dismissal of the complaint was proper, we affirm the judgment.
Plaintiffs brought suit against Apeo, Inc., Practical Products, Inc., and United States Hoffman Machinery…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Metallizing Engineering Co. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Aerovox Corporation v. Polymet Mfg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- A. Schrader's Sons v. Wein Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Paul Robine, Jr., and Walter C. Lambert v. Hon. Sylvester J. Ryan, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- U. S. Chemical Corporation and U. S. Plastic Products Corporation v. Plastic Glass CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Kent Industries, Inc., Sidney L. Caplan, Delores M. Caplan, Anne J. MossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Davis v. Ampthill Rayon Workers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1978
- Federal Sign & Signal Corp. v. Bangor Punta Operations, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1973
- Sauquoit Fibers Co. v. Leesona Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.