Legal Opinion

The Penza

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 16, 1925No. 71, 72PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

All parties have assumed, and we shall therefore assume, that this is the case of a foreign vessel procuring necessaries in a port of the United States; wherefore the maritime law of this country as expressed in statutes or handed down by tradition applies as fully as though Penza had gotten what she wanted in New York harbor.

The vital point of our fact findings is that everything bought and for which these libels were filed was gotten upon the direct order of Penza’s captain. That he sighed the bills covering the supplies mentioned’in the second libel is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. The South CoastSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Clyde Commercial S. S. Co. v. West India S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  4. The South CoastCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. J. H. Winchester & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Neset v. ChristensenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1950
  3. The A. S. ShermanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1930
  4. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co. v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1947
  5. Wade v. DworkinAlaska Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API