Legal Opinion

Snortum v. Homme

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1909No. Nos. 16,062—(270)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Oscar C. Snortum, the nominee of the Republican party tor the office of sheriff of Yellow Medicine county, for the purpose of making a contest appealed to the district court for that county from the count and canvass of votes by the county canvassing board made on November 7, 1908, declaring G. O. Homme to have received the largest number of votes for and to be elected sheriff of that county, and from the statement of that board made and filed with the auditor of the county…

Read the full summary

Oscar C. Snortum, the nominee of the Republican party tor the office of sheriff of Yellow Medicine county, for the purpose of making a contest appealed to the district court for that county from the count and canvass of votes by the county canvassing board made on November 7, 1908, declaring G. O. Homme to have received the largest number of votes for and to be elected sheriff of that county, and from the statement of that board made and filed with the auditor of the county that G. O. Homme had received 1,500 votes and Oscar C. Snortum had received only 1,240 votes. It was stipulated by the…

1Opinion of the Court

EER CURIAM.

The only question presented by this appeal is a construction of R. L. 1905, § 275, subd. 3, which provides that: .“When he [the voter] ■so desires, he may write other names in the blank spaces under the ■printed names of candidates, and the names so written shall be counted ,as balloted for, whether marked in the small square or not.”

The blank spaces are left on the official ballot to enable every voter, *467who so desires, to vote for any eligible elector he pleases. This is his constitutional right. The statute, then, must be liberally construed, and with reference to well-understood…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Canaan v. AbdelnourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Murray v. FloydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Prenevost v. DelormeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Aura v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Hanson v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API