Legal Opinion

Bleckley v. Langston

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 22, 1965No. 41353PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

The facts show a destruction of a substantial part of the real estate constituting the subject matter of the contract occurring between the date of the contract and the time fixed for performance without the fault of either party. The question where the loss must fall in these circumstances can be determined by the parties themselves by provisions in the contract. In this case the contract did not contain an agreement between the parties upon this subject and the court must decide the question.

It was established in England in 1801 that after a contract for the sale of realty and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Phinizy v. GuernseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Maddox v. RoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
  3. Fulton County v. AmorousSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  4. Walker v. General InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  5. Libman v. LevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jillson v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Winterchase Townhomes, Inc. v. KoetherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Continental Insurance v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1986
  4. Simmons v. KrallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API