Legal Opinion

Gould v. Hutchinson Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1939No. 34,250PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action to recover money. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

The action was brought to recover a commission for the assistance rendered the defendant by Gould and a man named Goering in the purchase of an oil and gas lease.

The petition, after alleging the corporate character of the defendant, alleged that about July 18, 1935, the defendant, through its officer and agent, A. B. Davis, employed plaintiff and E. P. Goering for the purpose of enabling defendant to purchase an interest in the Wendel lease in Rice county,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. BentleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. CrossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Manross v. Uncle Sam Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Pine v. Western National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Miller v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. State ex rel. Harley v. Dolese Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API