Peacock v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ALDERMAN, Justice.
Howell Peacock was charged with violating section 943.462(3), Florida Statutes (1977), Florida’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. His motion to dismiss on the basis that the RICO Act is unconstitutional was denied, and he pleaded nolo contendere, reserving his right to appeal the constitutional challenges.
The Second Judicial Circuit public defender was appointed to prosecute Peacock’s appeal. In his brief filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the public defender addresses the constitutional…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. WhiddonSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Moorehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morgan Walton Properties, Inc. v. INTERN. CITY BANK & TRUST CO.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
- State v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994