Legal Opinion

Peacock v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 8, 1981No. 58591PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDERMAN, Justice.

Howell Peacock was charged with violating section 943.462(3), Florida Statutes (1977), Florida’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. His motion to dismiss on the basis that the RICO Act is unconstitutional was denied, and he pleaded nolo contendere, reserving his right to appeal the constitutional challenges.

The Second Judicial Circuit public defender was appointed to prosecute Peacock’s appeal. In his brief filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the public defender addresses the constitutional…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. WhiddonSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Moorehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morgan Walton Properties, Inc. v. INTERN. CITY BANK & TRUST CO.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. State v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API