Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Danneman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 21, 1988No. 87-110PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court denying appellants’ request for attorney’s fees and costs under D.C. Code § 1-1320(e)(3) (1987). Appellants, Robert Johnson and the Bottle Bill Initiative Campaign, successfully intervened on the side of the District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics (“the Board”) in an action brought by appellee Sidney Danne-man challenging the Board’s summary statement and short title of a proposed initiative. If approved by the voters of the District of Columbia, the initiative would have required deposits on all…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Donnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- 31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 465, 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,497 Hanson Bratton v. City of Detroit, and Guardians of Michigan, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Trilon Plaza Co. v. Allstate Leasing Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilson v. BowserDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025