Legal Opinion
DaBronzo v. Roche Vitamins, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 17, 2002No. CIV.A. 02-227(AET)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
The primary issue presented on this motion for summary judgment by defendant Roche Vitamins, Inc. (“RVI”) is whether the protections afforded employees by the New Jersey Conscientious Employee Protection Act, N.J.S.A. 34:19-1, et seq., (“CEPA”) extend to independent contractors. This Court 1 holds that an -independent contractor, such as the plaintiff here, Thomas DaBronzo (“plaintiff’ or “DaBron-zo”), who complains to his employer about the alleged misconduct of another business entity with whom the employer has a business relationship, has no…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chrisanthis v. County of Atl.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
- D'ANNUNZIO v. Prudential Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
- Parsells v. Manhattan Radiology Group, L.L.P.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.