Legal Opinion

Batty v. Board of Education

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1936No. File No. 6419PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court sustaining a demurrer to the defendants’ answer. The material facts as we glean them from the pleadings are substantially as follows: The board of education of the city of Williston is a special school district, organized pursuant to the provisions of Article 9, chapter 12 of the Political Code (§§ 1229-1285, inclusive, Comp. Laws 1913). The defendant, J. N. Urness, is the superintendent of the high school conducted therein. The plaintiff, J. H. Batty, is a resident in and a patron of the school district. His minor son (age 18 on July 17,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Kinzer v. Directors of Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Wilson v. Board of Education of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Fertich v. MichenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Anderson v. BreithbarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seher v. Woodlawn School District No. 26North Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Myhre v. School Board of North Central Public School District No. 10North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Myhre v. School Board of North Central Public School District No. 10North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Seher v. Woodlawn School District No. 26North Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API