People v. Richards
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery, and appeals from the judgment. Two contentions are made by the appeal—viz.: 1. The information is not sufficient; and 2. The court erred in instructing the jury.
After the jury was sworn the defendant moved the court to disallow any testimony, upon the ground that the information did not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense, and after conviction he moved an arrest of judgment upon the same ground. These motions were denied.
It is not questioned that the information sufficiently charges the crime of robbery from the person by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. KamaunuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. FurtadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- People v. Chuey Ying GitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Boise City National Bank v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. NolanIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.