Legal Opinion
State v. Salisbury
Nebraska Court of Appeals
Decided May 19, 1998No. A-97-983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Irwin, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
David E. Salisbury appeals his conviction and sentence for theft by unlawful taking, in violation of § 20-151 of the Omaha Municipal Code. Generally, Salisbury contends that it was improper for the county court for Douglas County to order that he pay restitution in the amount of $2,577. We note that the ordinances under which Salisbury was charged and sentenced are not in the record before us. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On October 3, 1996, Salisbury was charged in the county court for Douglas County with theft by unlawful taking…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. McBrideNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Cincinnati v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. BuescherNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Lange v. Crouse Cartage Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LoydNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Green v. Drivers Management, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2001
- City of Beatrice v. MeintsNebraska Court of Appeals · 2013
- Opinion No. (2001), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2001