Legal Opinion

Berry v. Maldonado & Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 15, 1908Published

Motion for a compulsory reference.

1Opinion of the CourtDonnelly, J.

This is a motion for a compulsory reference on the ground that the action involves a long account. The motion is opposed by the defendant, who claims that, under the decision in the case of Steck v. C. F. & I. Co., 142 N. Y. 236, the question of whether or not a reference can be had without consent of both parties must be determined from an examination of the complaint alone. The rule in the Steck case, supra, if not modified, has been lim*443ited strictly to the case where the complaint does not set forth a canse of action which is referable, and the counterclaim is entirely independent of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Irving v. IrvingNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ames v. FrenchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Price v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API