Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Turner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 8, 1973No. [No. 115, September Term, 1972.]PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.

Three times in the recent past, we have had occasion to consider the fees allowed by orphans’ courts to counsel for executors, Riddleberger v. Goeller, 267 Md. 64, 296 A. 2d 393 (1972) ; Riddleberger v. Goeller, 263 Md. 44, 282 A. 2d 101 (1971) ; Lusby v. Nethken, 262 Md. 584, 278 A. 2d 552 (1971). The controlling statute in each of these cases was Maryland Code (1957, 1964 Repl. Vol.) Art. 93, § 10. What distinguishes this case from those is that here, for the first time, we are considering the problem of the allowance of a fee to counsel for a personal representative in the light of § 7-602…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  2. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. Riddleberger v. GoellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Gradman v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. Lusby v. NethkenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of PainterColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Beyer v. Morgan State UniversityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Piper Rudnick LLP v. HartzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Reuter v. ReuterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API