Legal Opinion

People v. Bledsoe

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 20, 1994No. 1-93-3284PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE DiVITO

delivered the opinion of the court:

The sole question in this appeal is whether section 5—2—4 of the Unified Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/5—2—4 (West 1992)) requires an independent examination by a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist for a petitioner, previously found not guilty by reason of insanity, who requests such an examination in seeking release from the custody of the Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities. For the reasons that follow, we hold that such an examination is required.

Petitioner Brian Bledsoe was acquitted by reason of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. PorterIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. YoungbeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Estate of Johnson v. Condell Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. RinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Radazewski v. CawleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. SheltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. People v. OwensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. People v. ChiakulasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. People v. MarshallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. People v. YoungermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API