Legal Opinion

Thorn v. George A. Hormel & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1940No. 32,204PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

The appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

The complaint alleges that defendant is a Delaware corporation engaged in packing house business (at Austin, Minnesota), including the slaughtering of hogs and the packing and sale of hog and pork products, it being the processor of hogs as defined by the Agricultural Adjustment Act (May 12, 1933, 48 St. 31, c. 25, 7 USCA, § 601, et seq.), and in connection therewith it purchases hogs from farmers and producers of hogs. It is alleged that defendant has retained the tax imposed under the provision of the act upon…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Fitchette v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Society Milion Athena, Inc. v. National Bank of GreeceNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Spear v. H. V. Greene Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peoples Store of Roseland v. McKibbinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Ballin v. Los Angeles County FairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API