Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. A. Waller & Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 25, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Henderson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

The appellant as plaintiff below brought this suit against the appellee to recover the sum of $410 for car service demurrage. It is averred in'the'petition that “the plaintiff, and other railway companies in Kentucky, *812some years ago, established rules for the handling of their freight cars with a view to promote the speedy loading and unloading of same, to facilitate traffic and commerce, and enable them to keep their cars in use, which rules were well known to the defendant and had been acted upon by it in its dealings with the plaintiff prior to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kentucky Wagon Manufacturing Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. River & Rail Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Dyer v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1869
  4. Louisville & N. R. v. Empire State Chemical Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cumberland Pipe Line Co. v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Sheriff of Estill CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. McKennaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API