Legal Opinion

Applebaum v. Avaya, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 20, 2002No. 375, 2002PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice.

In this appeal, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Chancery holding that a corporation could validly initiate a reverse stock split and selectively dispose of the fractional interests held by stockholders who no longer hold whole shares. The Vice Chancellor interpreted Section 155 of the Delaware General Corporation Law to permit the corporation, as part of a reverse/forward stock split, to treat its stockholders unequally by cashing out the stockholders who own only fractional interests while opting not to dispose of fractional interests of stockholders who will end…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. Smith v. Van GorkomSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  4. Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  5. Sinclair Oil Corporation v. LevienSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. H-M Wexford LLC v. Encorp, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
  2. Aspen Advisors LLC v. United Artists Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  3. Dell, Inc. v. Magnetar Global Event Driven Master Fund Ltd.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  4. DFC Global Corporation v. Muirfield Value Partners, L.P.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  5. Aspen Advisors LLC v. United Artists Theatre Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API