Legal Opinion

Fee v. Moore

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7654PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

Moore and Welch, at the February term, .1878, of the court below, commenced a suit against one Hull *320and wife on a note executed by Hull and a mortgage executed by Hull and wife to secure tbe payment of the note, both dated October 26th, 1876, making appellants Fee and Brown co-defendants therein, alleging that they were junior inpumbrancers, and claimed to have a lien upon the mortgaged property. Hull and wife were defaulted.

Appellants answered separately, but similar matters, in. defence; each filed a general denial and cross complaint, alleging, in substance, that before the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dequindre v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Truitt v. TruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Ney v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Davis v. WarfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Matlock v. StrangeIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Shirley v. GroveIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. First National Bank v. StanleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Lexington & Big Sandy Railroad v. Ford Plate Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Luckett v. HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API