Legal Opinion

People v. Pollum

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1950No. Crim. 4409PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Appellant Pollum, a chiropractor, and one Dr. Kirk were jointly indicted for four offenses of abortion, three of the subjects being married women and the fourth a single woman. Appellant was tried separately to a jury and was convicted on all counts. He was denied probation and sentenced to state prison. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Pour grounds of appeal are urged: (1) Insufficiency of the evidence as to each count; (2) error in admission as exhibits of certain surgical instruments; (3) error in .the receipt of testimony of a physician as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. People v. ClappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. KendallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. State v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. TatgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. SingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API