Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Grigg v. Hanna

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1938No. Docket No. 20, Calendar No. 39,294Published

1Concurrence

I concur in what Mr. Justice POTTER has said with respect to the liability of the defendants other than the Detroit Trust Company; but I cannot concur in his findings that plaintiff has established liability on the part of the trust company. He feels "constrained" to do so. I cannot reach the same conclusion without finding that the late Thomas T. Leete, former counsel for the executor of the estate of William H. Grigg, was guilty of "corrupt, fraudulent and criminal conduct." As stated in Mr. Justice POTTER'S opinion in a quotation from Egan v. Grece, 79 Mich. 629, 639, when such charges —…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. LyonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Egan v. GreceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Pierce v. PierceMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Baker v. FrischkornMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Kirby v. Gibson Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API