Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1997No. 28351PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On October 16, 1995, the State of Nevada charged appellant James Earl Harris (“Harris”) with indecent exposure, a gross misdemeanor, and using a controlled substance, a felony. The charges stemmed from allegations that Harris unlawfully made an indecent or obscene exposure to his ten-year-old daughter (“minor daughter”), at their apartment in Reno. The minor daughter allegedly told her brother (“minor son”) that Harris had “done something to her.”

Shortly thereafter, Alice Thompson (“Alice”), Harris’s wife, came home from work. The minor daughter told Alice that “daddy just tried to do…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. People v. BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Keys v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  5. United States v. Douglas Dale Kienenberger, United States of America v. Douglas Dale KienenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. McConnell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hollaway v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. SmallTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Vanisi v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Armis Arrendondo v. Dwight NevenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API