Legal Opinion
Frye v. Olan Mills
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 8, 2009No. 44,192-WCA, 44,193-WCA, 44,194-WCA, 44,195-WCAPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGaskins, J.
Lin these four consolidated appeals, the claimant, Judith Frye, argues that the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) erred in denying her claims for more medical and indemnity benefits for two separate work-related injuries. We affirm the ruling of the WCJ.
FACTS
In September 2001, the claimant, a photography assistant in the church directory division of Olan Mills, was injured when a door struck her right heel while she was working. She received medical and indemnity benefits but eventually resumed her job. In April 2004, the claimant filed a disputed claim for compensation with the Office of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Winford v. Conerly Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Fritz v. Home Furniture-LafayetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. DardarSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- Baker v. Harrah'sLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Bell v. Mid City Printers, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Morgan v. Glazers Wholesale Drug Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Gaines v. Home Care Solutions, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.