Legal Opinion

King Hill Irrigation District v. Craster Farm & Orchard Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

— In this . proceeding, which was commenced in the district court af Elmore county, appellants are resisting the assessment of $65 per acre upon their lands which was levied by the directors of the King Hill Irrigation District as benefits to said lands from the expenditure of a large *93amount of money, approximately $1,000,000, by the government of the United States in rebuilding, enlarging and improving certain portions of the canal system through which the lands of said irrigation district receive water.

King Hill Irrigation District embraces lands that were .formerly included in the King…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hemenway v. CraneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDonald v. PritzlIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Board of Directors of Wilder Irrigation District v. JorgensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Walker v. HughesIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Board of Directors of Wilder Irrigation District v. JorgensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API