Vasquez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WOMACK, J.,
delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court.
A jury found the appellant guilty of capital murder. Because the State did not *919seek the death penalty, the only available penalty was confinement for life. On appeal, the appellant argued that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to suppress his confession. The Court of Appeals agreed, holding that the police employed an unconstitutional, two-step technique of interrogation.1 We granted review. We shall vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case to that Court with instructions to remand this case to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Damian Lamon Murkledove v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
- Timothy Hutchison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
- White, Brian JasonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Jose Vasquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.