Legal Opinion
Roy v. Farr
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 14, 1969No. 41-69PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus by which the petitioner seeks to compel the board of health of the town of Richmond to abate an unhealthful condition existing on land adjacent to the residential property of both the petitioner and other persons as provided by 18 V.S.A. § 609.
The petition was brought on February 28, 1969. At that time defendants Farr, Conant and Palermo were the selectmen of the town of Richmond. Selectman Farr was the appointed health officer of the town. 18 V.S.A. § 601. The selectmen, together with the health officer, constitute the local board of health. 18…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hazen v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- Sanborn v. WeirSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Gerard Couture v. Selectmen of BerkshireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Barber v. ChaseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Garzo v. Stowe Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Richardson v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Alger v. Dept. of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Ouellette v. International Paper Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 1985
- Blake v. BetitSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.