Legal Opinion

Hardy and Co. v. . Turnage and Turnage

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBiiogdeN, J.

When Worthington died in September, 1928, and the defendant qualified as administrator in the following October, what was the status of the estate?

There were two farms in a high state of cultivation, containing 947 acres, apparently provided with a number of tenant houses and a number of tenants actually lived upon the land. There were eighteen mules and a variety of farming equipment. The administrator could not sell the property because a caveat had been filed to the will and C. S., 4161, spoke to him in the cold and rigid words of a public statute and said: “Suspend all further proceedings…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of Wright and Wright v. . BallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Overman v. . LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Overman v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. State Ex Rel. Torrence v. DavidsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Davis v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Harper v. HarperMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Graham v. . FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Graham v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API