Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1988No. 1133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

Appellant, Daniel Jordan Thompson, seeks to appeal from judgment of sentence entered following his conviction of third degree murder. We deny allowance of appeal of the discretionary aspects of sentence.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On August 4, 1986, appellant, David Reynier and Fred Bazzoli, consumed a case of beer while painting a home in Taylorstown, Pennsylvania. After work, they purchased a second case of beer and decided to drive to an isolated location and practice target shooting. Appellant had a .22 magnum rifle and Fred Bazzoli had a 30.06 rifle.

Appellant asked Fred to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DeversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. DardenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. FelixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. OsbornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Com. v. Tarpley, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. MoyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. MoyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API