Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Moyers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1990No. 434Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKelly, Judge

I join in all aspects of the majority opinion except the treatment of appellant’s challenge to the discretionary aspects of sentence. A recent en banc panel of this Court has ruled that to evaluate the substantive merits of challenges to discretionary aspects of sentences without regard to whether the appearance of a substantial question has been presented, as does the majority, allows appellant “ ‘in effect [to obtain] an appeal as of right from the discretionary aspects of a sentence.’ ” Commonwealth v. Williams, 386 Pa.Super. 322, 327, 562 A.2d 1385, 1388 (1989) (quoting Commonwealth v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. GambalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. WillisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. OsteenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API