Cavanaugh v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 101 — Action- of Supersedeas Bond APPEAL PROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT, LAW AND EQUITY DIVISION. Judgment for Plaintiff and Dependant Appeals. (No briefs in record.)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the court by
CHIEffi1 JUSTICE HAZELRICG
Reversing.,
In March, 1888, Riley and others obtained judgment in the Louisville chancery' court against Catherine Cav-anaugh, the present appellant, for something less than $2,000. From this judgment she prosecuted an appeal to-tins court without supersedeas, and on June 4, 1892, this. *760■court reversed the judgment, decidinp- that appellant, Cav-anaugh, did not owe any part of the judgment rendered. Cavanaugh v. Riley, 19 S. W., 745. When the case went back it was dismissed as against appellant, pursuant to the opinion and. mandate of this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bridges v. McAlisterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Yocum v. ForemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
- Hays v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
- Morgan v. HartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
- Salter v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1866
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Webb v. Webb's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Charles v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Drovers' & Mechanics' Nat. Bank v. Northern Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Smith v. Paducah Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.