Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Park v. Moorad (In Re Moorad)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1991No. 19-10037PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION

STEPHEN J. COVEY, Chief Judge.

The Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment upon the issues raised in his Complaint under 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(2)(B) and 523(a)(4). Granting of the motion is appropriate, if the moving party can prove no issue of material fact can be disputed. The facts are to be viewed in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party, the Debtor. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). The Court finds as follows.

PACTS

In 1985, the Debtor and Victor E. McCall, M.D. (“McCall”) decided to form a business…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Liberty National Bank v. Wing (In Re Wing)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
  4. Susi v. Mailath (In Re Mailath)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Brigadier Homes & U.S. Home Acceptance Corp. v. HertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bennett v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. David Harwood v. FNFS, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. FNFS, Ltd. v. Harwood (In Re Harwood)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
  4. Mullen v. Jones (In Re Jones)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
  5. Bennett v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API