Rowan v. Novotny
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz
Plaintiff appeals from the May 22,. 1985, order of the circuit court which dismissed his amended two-count complaint with prejudice.
He contends that (1) his complaint is not barred by the statute of limitations pursuant to the discovery rule; (2) the letter which the defendant wrote in reply to a request by the Department of Labor's Workers’ Compensation Commission exceeded the scope of his privilege; (3) sufficient facts were contained within the complaint to support the allegations of malice; and (4) the complaint alleged special damages.
We vacate and remand.
Count I of plaintiff’s amended…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Leitch v. HineIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
- Stanley v. ChastekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- Davis v. Keystone Printing Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hukic v. Aurora Loan ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Barber-Colman Co. v. A & K Midwest Insulation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Whalen v. K Mart Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Storm & Associates, Ltd. v. CuculichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.