Legal Opinion

Rowan v. Novotny

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 26, 1987No. 85-1937PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Plaintiff appeals from the May 22,. 1985, order of the circuit court which dismissed his amended two-count complaint with prejudice.

He contends that (1) his complaint is not barred by the statute of limitations pursuant to the discovery rule; (2) the letter which the defendant wrote in reply to a request by the Department of Labor's Workers’ Compensation Commission exceeded the scope of his privilege; (3) sufficient facts were contained within the complaint to support the allegations of malice; and (4) the complaint alleged special damages.

We vacate and remand.

Count I of plaintiff’s amended…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Leitch v. HineIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Stanley v. ChastekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Davis v. Keystone Printing Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hukic v. Aurora Loan ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Barber-Colman Co. v. A & K Midwest Insulation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Whalen v. K Mart Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Storm & Associates, Ltd. v. CuculichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API