Duke v. San Jacinto River Authority
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentBrookshire, Justice
This dissent is respectfully filed. This appeal before us involved directly the sole common-law exception to the employment-at-will doctrine in Texas law. Appellant, Duke, necessarily had to demonstrate three vital elements of his claim to remain in court. The three are: (1) a discharge or firing (2) for the sole reason (3) that he refused to perform an illegal or unlawful act. Hence, the absence of a material issue of fact as to any one of the three essential prongs of the plaintiff’s case would totally justify the granting of a summary judgment.
The River Authority takes the position that,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Otis Engineering Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.