Legal Opinion · Dissent

Duke v. San Jacinto River Authority

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 31, 1989No. 09-88-247-CVPublished

1DissentBrookshire, Justice

This dissent is respectfully filed. This appeal before us involved directly the sole common-law exception to the employment-at-will doctrine in Texas law. Appellant, Duke, necessarily had to demonstrate three vital elements of his claim to remain in court. The three are: (1) a discharge or firing (2) for the sole reason (3) that he refused to perform an illegal or unlawful act. Hence, the absence of a material issue of fact as to any one of the three essential prongs of the plaintiff’s case would totally justify the granting of a summary judgment.

The River Authority takes the position that,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Otis Engineering Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API