Legal Opinion

Lawman v. Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Ino.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 8, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01999Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KARI LAWMAN, : Civil No. 1:18-CV-01999 : Plaintiff, : : v. : : HERBERT, ROWLAND & GRUBIC, : INC., : : Defendant. : Judge Jennifer P. Wilson MEMORANDUM In this case, Plaintiff, Kari Lawman (“Lawman”), pursues claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) against her former employer, Defendant, Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc. (“HRG”). Specifically, Lawman asserts claims for disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, and retaliation. HRG’S motion for summary judgment is pending before the court.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Emil Jutrowski v. Township of RiverdaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API