Lawman v. Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Ino.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KARI LAWMAN, : Civil No. 1:18-CV-01999 : Plaintiff, : : v. : : HERBERT, ROWLAND & GRUBIC, : INC., : : Defendant. : Judge Jennifer P. Wilson MEMORANDUM In this case, Plaintiff, Kari Lawman (“Lawman”), pursues claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) against her former employer, Defendant, Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc. (“HRG”). Specifically, Lawman asserts claims for disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, and retaliation. HRG’S motion for summary judgment is pending before the court.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Emil Jutrowski v. Township of RiverdaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.