Legal Opinion

Meade v. Haines

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Defendant was supervisor of the township of Thomastown from April/ 1888, to April, 1889. A bridge had been constructed over the Tittabawassee river by the State Boad Bridge, Company. The township paid this company $7,500 towards the construction of the bridge, and in consideration thereof the company agreed to permit all tax-payers of the town to cross over the bridge free of toll or other charge.

Plaintiff resided in Bichland, an adjoining township, where he owned a farm of 200 acres. On March 16, 1888, he made a contract with one Abbey for the purchase of a strip of land off the east side of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Fletcher Paper Co. v. City of AlpenaMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Oakley Country Club v. LongMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. First National Bank of Missoula v. BaileyMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Spoon-Shacket Co. v. County of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API