Legal Opinion
Miney v. Donovan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 8, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*877In September 2001 the petitioner moved into her mother’s apartment, located in a Mitchell-Lama housing development (see Private Housing Finance Law § 10 et seq. [hereinafter the Mitchell-Lama Law]) in Queens known as the Big Six Towers, Inc. (hereinafter the Big Six), and allegedly has lived there continuously since then. The petitioner’s mother died in December 2003.
In July 2007 the petitioner received a letter from the Big Six denying her application for succession rights because she did not prove that she co-occupied the subject apartment with her mother, the tenant of record, for two…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In the Matter of Schorr v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
3Cited by6 opinions
- New Surfside Nursing Home, LLC v. DainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Quinto v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Fishbein v. New York City Department of Housing & PreservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- New Surfside Nursing Home, LLC v. DainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Rabinovich v. Commissioner of Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.