Legal Opinion
Petro Stopping Centers, L.P. v. Gall
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 11, 2009No. 5D08-2868PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
ON MOTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION AND REHEARING
The parties have filed motions for rehearing and clarification in connection with the opinion issued by this court on September 25, 2009. We deny the motions for rehearing but grant the motion for clarification, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute this corrected opinion in its stead.
Petro Stopping Centers, L.P. and Barry Flowers (hereinafter collectively referenced to as Petro) appeal the non-final order entered by the trial court denying their motion for summary judgment. In its motion, Petro claimed it was immune from liability for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mandico v. Taos Const., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Lowry v. LoganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Velez v. Oxford Development Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Jones v. Martin Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Wheeled Coach Industries, Inc. v. AnnulisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leticia Morales v. Zenith Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Vallejos v. Lan Cargo S.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Leticia Morales v. Zenith Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- Leticia Morales v. Zenith Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013