Legal Opinion
Strasburg v. Union Pacific RR. Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided November 1, 2013No. S-12-999PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets STRASBURG v. UNION PACIFIC RR. CO. 743 Cite as
286 Neb. 743
as the district court noted, this was a probation violation, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Leibel to 90 days in jail. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Affirmed. Shawn T. Strasburg, appellee, v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed November 1, 2013. No. S-12-999. 1. Statutes: Appeal and Error. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that an appellate court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Edward W. Blake v. Delaware and Hudson Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Blagg v. Illinois F.W.D. Truck & Equipment Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Alan R. Folkestad, and Cross-Appellee v. Burlington Northern, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- DMK Biodiesel v. McCoyNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jacobs Eng'g Grp. Inc. v. Conagra Foods, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Jacobs Engr. Group v. ConAgra FoodsNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- de Vries v. L & L Custom BuildersNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
- Pierce v. Landmark Mgmt. GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Kasel v. Union Pacific RR. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.